Frequently Asked Questions

Are there differences between defense and plaintiff malpractice work?

In defense cases, there is often an attestation or filing to review. I undertake the perspective of the surgeon and try to understand his or her actions at the various inflection points.

For plaintiff’s work the starting point is almost always a disappointing outcome. If the initial theory cannot be supported, other aspects of the case can be explored. Patients who believe they were victims of medical errors need experts to impartially review their cases without fear or favor.

How do you approach a cataract case?

Approximately 2-5% of cataract surgeries involve a complication; most fall under the rubric “risks of surgery” and are not medical errors. At times prevention or the management of the complication can be called into question. When the outcome is poor, the patient is more likely to seek second opinions or copies of their medical records.

Do you accept concussion and TBI cases?

Victims of traumatic brain injury and concussion can have post-accident vision problems. These include trouble reading, diplopia, visual memory loss, and light sensitivity. Visual dysfunction may not improve if symptoms persist for a year or longer. Vision therapy, occupational therapy and vestibular therapy are sometimes helpful. An IME is sometimes warranted.

Why should I choose you as an expert?

Most cases are variations on a theme. I view each as a puzzle. Based on feedback I have received from attorneys this forensic approach has proven valuable in case review and analysis.

However, highly technical cases relying on scientific research or patent analysis may call for a university chairperson or MD/PhD expertise.